Using the Monty Hall Problem to Undercut Christianity

What is Christianity?I first came across the Monty Hall Problem 20 years ago in Parade magazine:

Suppose you’re on a game show, and you’re given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats.  You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what’s behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat.  He then says to you, “Do you want to pick door No. 2?”

Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?

Most people think that it doesn’t matter and that there’s no benefit to switching.  They’re wrong, but more on that in a moment.

Humans have a hard time with probability problems like this one.  You’d think that we’d be fairly comfortable with basic probability, but apparently not.

Here’s another popular probability problem: how many people must you have in a group before it becomes more likely than not that any two of them have the same birthday?

The surprising answer is 23.  In other words, imagine two football teams on the field (11 per team) and then throw in a referee, and it’s more than likely that you’ll find a shared birthday.  If your mind balks at this, test it at your next large gathering.

Now, back to the Monty Hall Problem.  A good way to understand problems like this is to push them to an extreme.  Imagine, for example, that there are not three doors but 300 doors.  There’s still just one good prize, with the rest being goats (the bad prize).

So you pick a door—say number #274.  There’s a 1/300 chance you’re right.  This needs to be emphasized: you’re almost certainly wrong.  Then the game show host opens 298 of the remaining doors: 1, 2, 3, and so on.  He skips door #59 and your door, #274.  Every open door shows a goat.

Now: should you switch?  Of course you should—your initial pick is still almost surely wrong.  The probabilities are 1/300 for #274 and 299/300 for #59.

Another way to look at the problem: do you want to stick with your initial door or do you want all the other doors?  Switching is simply choosing all the other doors, because (thanks to the open doors) you know the only door within that set that could be the winner.

One lesson from this is that our innate understanding of probability is poor, and a corollary is that there’s a big difference between confidence and accuracy.  That is, just because one’s confidence in a belief is high doesn’t mean that the belief is accurate.  This little puzzle does a great job of illustrating this.

Perhaps you’ve already anticipated the connection with choosing a religion.  Let’s imagine you’ve picked your religion—religion #274, let’s say.  For most people, their adoption of a religion is like picking a door in this game show.  In the game show, you don’t weigh evidence before selecting your door; you pick it randomly.  And most people adopt the dominant religion of their upbringing.  As with the game show, the religion in which you grew up is also assigned to you at random.

Now imagine an analogous game, the Game of Religion, with Truth as host.  Out of 300 doors (behind each of which is a religion), the believer picks door #274.  Truth flings open door after door and we see nothing but goats.  Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, Mormonism—all goats.  As you suspected, they’re all myth.

Few of us seriously consider or even understand the religions Winti, Candomblé, Mandaeism, or the ancient religions of Central America, for example.  Luckily for the believer, Truth gets around to those doors too and opens them to reveal goats.

Here’s where the analogy between the two games fails.  First, Truth opens all the other doors.  Only the believer’s pick, door #274, is still closed.  Second, there was never a guarantee that any door contained a true religion!  Since the believer likely came to his beliefs randomly, why imagine that his choice is any more likely than the others to hold anything of value?

Every believer plays the Game of Religion, and every believer believes that his religion is the one true religion, with goats behind all the hundreds of other doors.  But maybe there’s a goat behind every door.  And given that the lesson from the 300-door Monty Hall game is that the door you randomly picked at first is almost certainly wrong, why imagine that yours is the only religion that’s not mythology?

6 thoughts on “Using the Monty Hall Problem to Undercut Christianity

  1. Two problems with your argument.
    1. Are you as an atheist are now assuming there is one true religion ( God). Good prize?
    2. Men do not randomly choose Chrisitanity? True believers are choosen by God first. The result of God’s regeneration of His elect is revealed when the sinner by Faith follows Jesus Christ. Something a spiritually dead sinner can not do on his own. Salvation is of God , not man. So you mis- represent the doctrine of soteriology. As usual.

    • 1. Uh … no, I do not assume any true religion. A trick question, perhaps?

      2. Let’s approach this objectively, without bias and without Christian presuppositions. Yet again, clarifying elements of your particular theology is of no help to those trying to follow the evidence to the best explanation.

  2. Bob says:
    “Lets approach this objectively……” Huh? There is an objective approach? So where is this objective approach we are to follow? Does it exist outside our minds? I thought you said there is no objective truths? What standard do you use for these objectives?

    • I said that I see no evidence for objective (that is: transcendental or supernatural) moral truths. In this case, I was using the word to mean “that which we can all agree is true.” Hope this helps.

  3. “…..without bias and without Christian presuppositions. Yet again, clarifying elements of your particular theology is of no help to those trying to follow the evidence to the best explanation”.
    It is not my particular theology. I will not let you represent a Chrsitianity that does not exist. Man does not have the ability to choose Chrsitianity and follow by faith Jesus Chrsit. Unless God first regenerates that indiviual..The Chrsitian can not on his own free will choose to follow Jesus Christ. Unless God and Jesus wills it to be so..So I wiill not allow you to misrepresent Chrsitianity. Man does not say ” gee I think I will be a Chrsitian and accept Jesus as my savior and get my ticket punched for heaven”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>